The Baby Decision
by Merle Bombardieri
Contents
Overview
Merle Bombardieri’s The Baby Decision is a practical, compassionate guide for anyone wrestling with whether to have a child. Blending logic with emotion, Bombardieri reframes the question as an opportunity for personal growth rather than a test you can fail. Through case examples, step-by-step exercises, and clear ground rules, she helps readers surface hidden motives, reduce panic, and make a deliberate choice that reflects their values—not social pressure.
The book follows couples like Laura and Michael Rose as stand-ins for common ambivalences about career, intimacy, freedom, and meaning. It maps three growth paths—choose parenthood, choose a childfree life, or postpone with purpose—and warns against drifting into decisions. Along the way, it debunks myths about both parenting and the childfree path, addresses outside influences from family and culture, and offers tools for equitable partnership, especially when partners disagree.
Bombardieri also provides practical roadmaps for real-world options: delayed parenthood, having only one child, adoption, alternative family building for LGBT people, single parenthood by choice, and coping with infertility. She closes with guidance for thriving after the decision—whether embracing a childfree life or preparing for parenthood with realistic expectations, shared responsibilities, and sustainable self-care.
Plot Summary ⚠️ Spoilers
The Baby Decision opens with Laura and Michael Rose, a content couple immobilized by ambivalence about having a child. Their hopes for parenthood collide with fears about work, lifestyle, and relationship strain—echoing the conflicting messages they see in friends’ outcomes. Merle Bombardieri uses their dilemma to introduce her method: integrate feelings and facts, pursue growth over safety, and claim the right to decide on your own timetable. She sets a respectful tone with a Decision Maker’s Bill of Rights, acknowledges constraints such as finances and inequality, and explains why fertility and adoption appear early—to inform choices, support readers in treatment, and normalize alternatives.
A bird’s-eye chapter builds perspective before deeper work. Bombardieri argues the decision should be shared within couples to support later co-parenting and encourages single parents by choice to engage their “village.” To reduce panic, she reframes urgency as a feeling, not a fact, and offers calming steps. In true emergencies—unplanned pregnancy or medical changes—she urges taking days, not minutes, for rest, consultation, and second opinions. She contrasts fear-driven rumination with growth-oriented curiosity and uses worst-case visualizations to surface real risks and plan supports, lowering anxiety so both paths can be explored honestly.
Readers then enter “Secret Doors” to uncover hidden motives. Gestalt-style chair dialogues separate the wish to parent from the wish to remain childfree, revealing how pronatalist pressure can drown out an authentic no—or how fear can mute a yes. Imagery exercises bring abstract ideas into the body: pregnancy and birth, holding an infant, idealized child fantasies, and realistic scans of each developmental stage. Values tests—epitaphs, surprise pregnancy scenarios, and the “knapsack” of tradeoffs—force clarity about what one is willing to give up or reimagine. Timetable tools (hour counts, life-cycle mapping, “rocking chair” regret tests) help readers choose the path they’d regret least. Couples assess decision power, division of labor, and changed minds since courtship, and close with a pragmatic readiness checklist spanning safety, mental health, empathy, flexibility, sobriety, supports, and relationship stability.
External pressure gets its own chapter. Bombardieri shows how parental expectations, peer judgments, and cultural stereotypes intensify ambivalence by triggering shame, fear, and loyalty conflicts. Individuation—not reflexive compliance or rebellion—becomes the goal. She highlights projections (e.g., fearing a partner will repeat a parent’s mistakes) and offers assertiveness tools: a pressure victim’s bill of rights, humor, dodging, concise I-statements, reframing, and selective disclosure. Naming the “games” people play (“You’ll be sorry,” “We have more fun than you”) helps readers see others’ ambivalence rather than absorb it as truth.
“Poison vials” are the extremes of idealization and doom that distort judgment. Bombardieri punctures myths that parents must feel constant bliss or that childfree people will necessarily regret their choice. She distinguishes healthy self-love from selfishness and shows how motives evolve over a lifespan. Experiments like “borrowing” children can inform but mislead without context; she provides guardrails to make trials useful without overgeneralizing. Permission to change one’s mind—and to have only one child—keeps decisions flexible and reality-based.
Turning to happiness, Bombardieri argues it is value-defined. She explores adventure, risk, spontaneity, and flexibility, showing how both parenting and childfree paths can deliver meaning when aligned with a personal mission. Drawing on Robert Jay Lifton’s modes of “immortality” and ideas from Martin Buber and Abraham Maslow, she helps readers locate purpose beyond biology and confront the “Jonah complex,” the fear of one’s own potential. Solitude, freedom, and intimacy receive balanced treatment, as do community and “chosen family.” Research suggests either path can support well-being; differences are modest and moderated by planning and equity. The core rule: proceed only if both partners genuinely want a child.
When couples disagree, Bombardieri contrasts respectful I–Thou dialogue with coercive tactics. She catalogs manipulations—arm-twisting, avoidance, shaming, sabotage—and counters them with structured negotiation, scheduled talks, and clear “I” messages. She encourages identifying condition-based disagreements (timing, workload, finances, adoption) and asking, “How could I make my choice easier for you?” If stalemates persist, try counseling or a time-limited postponement; when one is adamantly for and the other adamantly against, she advises choosing childfree to protect the relationship. She rejects the idea of being a “single” parent within a marriage and examines second-marriage tensions between already-been parents and never-been parents, offering exercises to decouple old resentments from new partnerships. Therapy and grief work can deepen intimacy even when the decision stays childfree.
Delayed parenthood is presented with pros (maturity, stability, resources) and cons (medical risks, energy, overlapping retirement). Prenatal screening and sound health habits mitigate some risk, but over-35 motherhood is not ideal for everyone. Practical planning—fitness, finances, estate documents, college funds, and nurtured grandparent ties—prepares families. The chapter normalizes common reasons for delay and models calm responses to ageist criticism.
Choosing one child is framed as a “singular solution.” Research counters myths about only children, while guidance addresses potential downsides with peer contact and independence-building. The second- and third-child decisions get reality checks: enjoyment of one does not simply double, and stress and costs often surge. Budgeting, motive-testing, and grieving the imagined child help couples embrace a one-child family when it best fits.
Alternative parenting routes follow. For LGBT families, the book balances gains in acceptance with ongoing prejudice and offers checklists for who carries, donor choices, surrogacy, adoption, sequencing, and legal steps (e.g., second-parent adoption). Single parenthood by choice is validated with candid discussion of dating, identity questions, bias, and the need for robust supports. Ethical cautions around conception and known donors reinforce clarity and legal safety. Adoption—domestic, international, open, special-needs, and legal-risk—is mapped in detail, with emphasis on grieving infertility first, understanding home studies, and aligning expectations with a child’s needs.
Infertility receives a psychological toolkit: when to seek evaluation, coping with pregnancy loss as a family loss, and managing the stress of treatment and the anxiety of pregnancy after infertility. Readers are urged to use reputable medical care, support groups, and stress-reduction practices, and to set boundaries with online communities. When considering pauses or stopping, Bombardieri distinguishes stepping back from choosing alternatives and provides values questions, extended consultations, second opinions, and grief rituals to move from diffuse sorrow to processed grief—enabling a clearer yes, no, or next step.
As readers near a decision, Bombardieri normalizes last-minute panic. She recommends revisiting core exercises, a two-week “try-on” of each path, deciding one baby at a time, and noting the asymmetry of options—parenting is irreversible, while childfree people can later pursue pregnancy, adoption, or child-related roles. She explains when to seek workshops, individual therapy, or couples counseling, how to select neutral professionals, and why help reflects thoroughness, not weakness.
Two closing tracks support life after deciding. For a childfree life: protect boundaries, cultivate solitude and chosen family, channel care through meaningful work or relationships, and think carefully about sterilization’s benefits and irreversibility. For those choosing parenthood: prepare psychologically, learn child development, keep identity and couple time visible, and avoid maternal martyrdom through shared labor, realistic standards, and self-care.
The final chapters confront work–family realities. While advocating an “infrastructure of care,” Bombardieri offers immediate strategies: flexible pacing of careers, equitable division of labor, father involvement, and rigorous child care selection with trial periods and ongoing observation. The book ends by helping readers consolidate their decision, “borrow” satisfactions from the road not taken, manage ambivalence without proselytizing, and announce choices strategically—especially at work. Many experience relief, energy, and renewed creativity once a deliberate decision replaces indecision.
Characters
- Merle BombardieriAuthor-therapist narrator who guides readers through a blended emotion-and-logic method, exercises, and pragmatic options so they can choose parenthood, choose childfree, or postpone with purpose.
- Laura RoseA composite case in the introduction who vacillates between wanting a baby and preserving work, art, and relationship quality, anchoring the book’s central ambivalence.
- Michael RoseLaura’s partner in the opening vignette; he longs for fatherhood yet worries about lifestyle changes, illustrating shared decision-making and competing values.
- Therapist/CounselorA recurring professional role who supports individuals and couples in processing ambivalence, resolving conflict, managing infertility grief, and preparing for either path.
- Reproductive EndocrinologistFertility specialist consulted for evaluation, treatment options, monitoring, and candid guidance when considering pausing or stopping medical interventions.
- Prospective parents facing infertilityReaders navigating diagnosis, loss, and treatment stress; they apply coping tools, seek support, and decide whether to continue treatment, adopt, or live childfree.
- Prospective adoptive parentsIndividuals or couples weighing motives, readiness, and forms of adoption—domestic, international, open, special needs—while completing home studies and setting realistic expectations.
- Adoption agency/workerGuides education and home study, assesses safety and preparedness, coordinates placements, and prioritizes timely matches aligned with a child’s needs.
- Birth parentsPotential partners in open adoption who may select adoptive families and shape contact, reminding readers to center a child’s continuity and well-being.
- Adopted childThe focus of adoption planning and support, whose age, background, and needs determine fit, openness, and the level of family preparation required.
- Childfree individuals/couplesReaders who choose not to parent; they set boundaries against pronatalist pressure, design fulfilling missions and communities, and may consider sterilization with care.
- Parents/new parentsReaders who decide to have a child; they prepare psychologically, share labor, protect identity and couple time, and build flexible community and child care supports.
- Single parents by choiceIndividuals who pursue parenting without a partner; they plan supports, finances, and legal protections while addressing stigma and child identity questions.
- Partner/SpouseThe co-decision maker in couple scenarios; shares ownership of the choice, negotiates conditions, and commits to equitable caregiving if choosing parenthood.
- Friends/FamilySources of support or pressure whose expectations can cloud decisions; the book offers assertiveness tools to set limits and preserve authentic choice.
- Employers/coworkersWorkplace stakeholders considered when announcing pregnancy or family plans; they shape leave, flexibility, and career pacing strategies.
- Pronatalists/criticsPeople who challenge childfree decisions or romanticize parenting; their views are reframed as projections to be managed with concise, respectful boundaries.
- Robert Jay LiftonPsychiatrist whose five modes of ‘immortality’ broaden meaning beyond biological parenthood, helping readers align the decision with purpose.
- Abraham MaslowPsychologist whose growth-versus-safety framework and ‘Jonah complex’ illuminate fears that can derail pursuing one’s true mission.
- Martin BuberPhilosopher cited to emphasize actualizing one’s unique potential and sustaining I–Thou respect in high-stakes couple dialogues.
- Jane HowardWriter whose vision of ‘found’ families informs the book’s approach to building community for both parents and the childfree.
- Ann-Marie SlaughterPolicy advocate referenced for the ‘infrastructure of care’—paid leave, child care, protections—contextualizing individual strategies within systemic gaps.
- Arlie HochschildSociologist whose ‘second shift’ research underlines the need for equitable division of labor in households choosing parenthood.
Themes
Merle Bombardieri’s The Baby Decision is less a manual about babies than a treatise on freedom, responsibility, and meaning. Across its chapters, the book reframes a culturally freighted choice as a deliberate act of self-authorship, equipping readers with tools to disentangle desire from pressure and to choose with integrity.
- Radical autonomy and the ethics of conscious choice. From the Introduction’s Decision Maker’s Bill of Rights and the “cutting away” definition of deciding, the book insists happiness grows from chosen roles, not defaults. Chapter 1’s growth-versus-safety framework contrasts intentional paths (commit, commit childfree, or time-bound postponement) with “safety” traps like drifting or accidental parenthood—patterns embodied by Laura and Michael Rose’s ambivalence and later by couples who move from paralysis to agency.
- Integrating emotion with reason. Rather than privileging logic, Bombardieri elevates a blended method: Chapter 2’s chair dialogues, “monster” fantasies, epitaphs, and the rocking-chair test surface motives beneath scripts; Chapter 1’s “anxiety-proofing” invites worst-case visualizations so fear becomes planning (as with Susan and Mark). In Chapter 6, Bettina and Hal transform stalemate into conditional options, modeling how feelings inform workable terms.
- Deconstructing pronatalism and cultural scripts. Chapters 3 and 4 expose the “pressure cooker” and “poison vials”—stereotypes, shaming, and either-or myths. Assertiveness tools, humor, and the question “Why does it matter to you?” restore boundaries. Chapter 8 dismantles the only-child stigma; Chapter 9 normalizes LGBT and single parenthood, separating capacity to nurture from conformity.
- Plural paths to meaning, happiness, and generativity. Chapter 5 relocates fulfillment beyond biology, invoking Lifton’s “immortality” modes and Buber’s mission. The book honors adoption (Chapter 11), coping with infertility and grief (Chapter 10), and embracing a childfree identity (Chapter 13). Vignettes like Jen and Will’s shift to adoption and Aileen and Roger’s reaffirmed childfree choice show grief processed into clarity.
- Relational ethics and equity. The text rejects arm‑twisting, sabotage, and “single” married parenting (Chapter 6), insisting on shared power and transparent motives. Later chapters push that ethic into practice: equitable division of labor, father growth, and childcare discernment (Chapter 15) prevent martyrdom (Chapter 14) and sustain the self within family.
- Time, risk, and the asymmetry of reversibility. Chapter 7’s late-parenthood lens and Chapter 12’s caution about irrevocable steps foreground mortality, fertility windows, and the wisdom of “one baby at a time.” Constructive postponement with review dates balances courage with care.
Ultimately, The Baby Decision teaches that whichever path one chooses—parenthood, childfree, or avenues in between—what matters is the rigor and compassion with which the choice is made and lived (Chapter 16).